Kansas’s new animal-disease lab faces years-long delays and technical faults before opening for high-containment research
The $1.25bn National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan remains unfinished three years after unveiling, hampered by technical faults delaying critical research on livestock diseases.
Kansas’s giant new animal-disease laboratory is still not ready for the work it was built to do, three years after its public unveiling, according to a recent report from the US Department of Agriculture’s inspector-general.
The National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility in Manhattan, a $1.25bn project intended to replace Plum Island and become America’s flagship centre for high-containment livestock research, is still being held back by technical faults including room sealing and air-pressure problems. Those deficiencies must be fixed before the laboratory can handle select agents such as foot-and-mouth disease and African swine fever, the report says.
USDA has said it expects the problems affecting biosafety level 3 work to be resolved by spring 2027, at an estimated cost of $78mn. But it has not set a timetable for the additional repairs needed to bring the higher-security BSL-4 suites online for viruses such as Nipah and Hendra.
The delay has left the US without a live-foot-and-mouth research site since Plum Island stopped research in 2025, creating a gap in a programme that dates back to 1954. Science reported that an independent review last year found more than 100 obstacles to full operation, including missing animal gates and weak air-supply continuity.
DHS said in earlier material that construction and commissioning were complete, but the inspector-general concluded the facility was not properly configured for high-level animal disease work. Researchers say the lab remains vital for food security, even if it arrives late.
"This news service is powered by an AI tool that curates and enhances the content related to animal health. The articles provided are for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional or veterinary advice. The content presented does not reflect the views or opinions of Stonehaven Analytics."